Phil Rosen
July 30, 2026
TL;DR
As semiconductor and AI stocks face correction due to unsustainable expectations and massive leverage exposure, healthcare, energy, and financials are emerging as better-performing alternatives that offer diversification and lower correlation to tech.
“Semiconductor ETFs are averaging about $40 billion traded per day. When ChatGPT was released, that number was four. So a tenfold increase in dollar volume in the last couple of years.”
— Todd Sone
“Leverage is not supposed to be bought for the long run. It's meant to be held day-to-day, but when you get a V-bottom accompanied by stimulus and you get rallies that go up 1-3% per day, that's when leverage really comes in handy.”
— Todd Sone
“If you're down 20%, you're going to need more than a 10% day to get back to even. You may get lucky, but more often than not, it's really hard for these things to come back from the dead.”
— Todd Sone
“Healthcare is like the boycott wolf—it's been off the field for better part of three years, going from 16% of the S&P to 8% of the S&P. That's the type of move where people got very bearish and threw in the towel.”
— Todd Sone
1. Semiconductor Valuations and Market Frenzy
Semiconductor ETFs average $40 billion in daily trading volume (a 10-fold increase from $4 billion when ChatGPT launched), indicating extreme investor emotion and frenetic behavior similar to past market bubbles like ARK Innovation ETF in 2020.
2. Leverage and Mechanical Risk in Tech
Leveraged ETFs with only $200 billion in assets ($500 billion notional) but driving 15-20% of daily market volume are disproportionately concentrated in NASDAQ and semiconductor names, creating systemic selloff risk when these holdings decline.
3. High Beta Exposure at Extremes
High-beta and high-volatility stocks are at top decile performance levels historically, signaling the need for hedges through low-volatility factor ETFs like SPLV, which holds minimal tech exposure and trades inversely to the broader S&P 500.
4. Healthcare as Contrarian Play
Healthcare's weight in the S&P fell from 16% to 8% over three years as capital fled the sector, but biotech names like Eli Lilly (15% of healthcare sector) have worked, creating opportunity in equipment and provider names that remain overlooked.
5. Energy Sector Negative Beta Opportunity
Energy's beta to the S&P has flipped negative, making it a genuine hedge alongside commodities and natural resources; despite being only 3% of the index, it benefits from deglobalization trends bringing resources back to home countries.
6. Financials Underinvested Despite Strength
Financial sector ETFs trade at new highs but show lukewarm inflows despite booming M&A activity, IPO volume, and strong bank earnings, indicating retail underexposure; regional banks in particular are emerging as stock picks from professional investors.
7. Small-Cap Revenge After Massive Outflows
Small-cap ETFs experienced their first annual outflows in 2025 (first since 2011) before rebounding; the Russell 2000 rebalancing in June graduated mega-cap AI names like Bloom Energy, positioning remaining small caps for continued strength if regional banks and biotech hold.
8. Rotation Away from AI Winners
Equal-weight S&P 500 has outperformed cap-weighted as semiconductors (down to ~19% from peaks) and tech (near 40%) correct, confirming a rotation into boring, low-correlation sectors like utilities, consumer staples, insurance, and non-AI healthcare.
9. Government Support as Market Wildcard
The Trump administration views the stock market as a scoreboard and is heavily invested in AI and infrastructure buildout, creating a potential stimulus or government stake scenario in companies like Intel or rare earth mineral firms that could act as a bull market driver.
10. Portfolio Diversification Strategy for Young Investors
Young investors conditioned by the COVID rebound and AI bull market underestimate diversification value; adding low-volatility, non-correlated holdings (the 'sprinkler system') provides downside protection without requiring market timing, particularly with equal-weight indices and factor-based ETFs.