Veritasium
July 13, 2026
TL;DR
A famous Google interview question asks what you'd do if shrunk to nickel size and placed in a blender with 60 seconds before the blades spin, testing creative problem-solving rather than a single correct answer.
“I would like to think I could duck down and miss the blades.”
“Honestly, the thing I would think about is trying to get to the very center of the blades. It's spinning around me, but the actual RPM is probably not that high if I'm standing in the middle.”
“But these answers don't cut it.”
1. The Question Setup
A famous Google interview question presents a scenario where the candidate is shrunk to nickel size and placed in a blender with 60 seconds before the blades start spinning.
2. Common Wrong Answers
Candidates offer various responses including ducking under blades, pushing the button, asking nicely, accepting defeat, attempting quantum tunneling, using clothes as rope, and catching air drafts—all of which fail to address the real intent of the question.
3. The Better Approach
A more effective answer involves understanding the physics: positioning at the center of the blades where RPM is low, and potentially timing an attachment to the blade tips to swing around without harm.