Alex Hormozi
May 30, 2026
TL;DR
Setting aggressive, unrealistic growth targets (like $2M to $100M in 13 months) forces failed strategies that can set your business back for a decade; longer timelines with the same goals are far more achievable.
“I don't know of a single business in your space that's gone from two to 100 in 13 months.”
— Mentor
“sometimes you can shoot yourself in the foot for a decade because you're trying to go from two to 100 in 12 months”
— Mentor
“every strategy that you try and go from two to 100 fails because you want to do it in 12 months. But if you did it in 10 years, you'd for sure hit it.”
— Mentor
1. The Unrealistic Growth Goal
An entrepreneur shares ambitions to grow from $2 million to $100 million by the end of 2025 (13 months), citing lack of capital as the main blocker.
2. The Problem With Compressed Timelines
The mentor points out that no business in the entrepreneur's space has achieved this growth rate in 13 months, and explains how pursuing this impossible target forces flawed strategies.
3. The Cost of Failed Strategies
Attempting to reach $100M in 12 months leads to strategy failures that can damage the business for a decade, whereas the same goal over 10 years is entirely achievable.
4. Reframing Expectations
By decoupling the ambitious end goal from the unrealistic timeline, the entrepreneur can commit to the same $100M vision on a realistic 10-year path.