Phil Rosen
July 18, 2026
TL;DR
AI adoption is primarily driven by consumer demand for personalized advice rather than revolutionary business applications, yet companies are unsustainably losing thousands per user to subsidize this service.
“It's a replacement for Google search. It is better than Google search. It does not have the same ads that have become, you know, completely endemic in the context of something like Google search.”
— Mike Green
“People want that information, and they love it when it's subsidized at very cheap cost. Now, it's somewhat absurd that we're seeing the AI companies lose thousands of dollars per user in order to provide this type of advice.”
— Mike Green
1. The Gap Between Marketing and Reality
There's a significant misunderstanding between the economics companies are presenting and the actual economic reality that will emerge from AI adoption.
2. Current Adoption Patterns: Advice and Convenience
Most users are employing AI for daily practical advice (travel planning, general questions) rather than building broad applications or revolutionizing industries. The mother-in-law example illustrates how ordinary consumers use AI as a search replacement.
3. AI as a Search Alternative
AI improves upon Google search by providing unbiased answers without endemic advertising, though ads are beginning to appear in competitors like Gemini as companies seek revenue models.
4. Fulfilling Timeless Human Needs
AI satisfies deep-rooted human desires for personalized guidance and non-judgmental advice—desires that historically drove the popularity of advice columns. Users value the accessibility and lack of social consequences.
5. The Unsustainable Economics Problem
AI companies are losing thousands of dollars per user to subsidize cheap or free services, creating a fundamental economic misalignment that cannot persist.