Ali Abdaal
April 4, 2018
TL;DR
Most students use ineffective study techniques like rereading and highlighting, but research shows active recall and retrieval practice are far more powerful for learning and exam performance.
“No one ever really teaches us how to study. We tend to just go with what feels intuitively right. And as we'll see, the research has shown that actually the techniques that students think are the most intuitive often tend not to be the ones that are actually the most effective.”
— Ollie
“The very act of retrieving stuff from your brain actually strengthens the connections between the stuff in your brain... we learn far better by retrieving practicing retrieving stuff from our brains than by trying to put stuff back into our brain.”
— Ollie
“A wealth of research has shown that passive repetitive reading produces little or no benefit for learning. Yet, not only was repetitive reading the most frequently listed strategy, it was also the strategy most often listed at students number one choice by a large margin.”
— 2016 research paper
“Based on the available evidence, we rate rereading as having low utility. Although rereading is relatively economical with respect to time demands, when compared with other learning techniques, rereading is also typically much less effective.”
— Professor Dunloski
1. Three Ineffective Revision Techniques
Examines rereading, highlighting, and summarizing/note-taking. Research by Professor Dunloski and others shows these popular methods have low utility despite feeling productive. Rereading is 'relatively economical' but 'much less effective' than alternatives. Highlighting acts as a 'safety blanket' but doesn't boost performance on inference-based tasks. Summarization requires extensive training to be effective.
2. Why Active Recall Works
Active recall (practice testing) is rated as having 'high utility' by evidence reviews. The act of retrieving information from memory strengthens neural connections, making it far more powerful than putting information in. Decades of research consistently show practice testing is more effective than rereading multiple times.
3. Three Historical Studies Demonstrating Active Recall's Power
A 1939 study showed practice testing improved retention by 10-15%. A 2010 study demonstrated 30% performance gains from practice testing. A 2011 study found that reading once + active recall outperformed reading four times, yet students rated repeated reading as more effective—showing intuition mismatches evidence.
4. Practical Strategy 1: Anki Flashcards
Anki is a free flashcard app that automates spaced repetition. Users rate card difficulty (easy/medium/hard), and the algorithm adjusts when cards reappear. Effective for memorizing facts (anatomy, pharmacology) and thematic content (study descriptions for essays). Medical students report it's essential for exam success.
5. Practical Strategy 2: Notes with Book Closed
After learning a topic, close the book and write/draw spider diagrams from memory in your own words. Then open the book and fill in missed details. This forces active recall and retrieval practice. The speaker used this aggressively for psychology exams, achieving their best performance ever.
6. Practical Strategy 3: Cornell Question Method
Instead of passive note-taking, write questions based on the material. During revision, answer questions from memory rather than rereading. This method forces cognitive effort and strengthens memory connections. A first-year medical student ranked second in their cohort using only this technique.
7. Conclusion and Future Topics
Active recall is the most important technique; spaced repetition and interleaving will be covered in future videos. Any activity requiring cognitive effort to retrieve information strengthens learning. Students should replace passive techniques with active recall for dramatically better results.